A forum held on June 16 for candidates running for at-large seats on the Boston City Council revealed stark differences in how individuals would approach education, public safety, housing, and other issues.

Suffolk University drew eight of the nine candidates seeking the four citywide seats: incumbents Ruthzee Louijeune, Julia Mejia, Henry Santana, and Erin Murphy, and challengers Will Onuoha, Marvin Mathelier, Alexandra Valdez, and Frank Baker. Yves Mary Jean, who did not attend the first candidates’ forum, did not attend this one either.

On issue after issue, Onuoha and Baker – often joined by Murphy – voiced opinions in direct opposition to the rest of the field.

Education
The question of whether Boston School Committee members should be elected or appointed by the mayor, as they are now, elicited strong reactions from the candidates. Only Valdez, Baker, and Onuoha said they do not support having an elected committee.

“Our kids matter far too much for us to start playing politics with education,” Onuoha said.

Mejia quickly countered him. “To say that Black and Brown people are under-educated or unable to decide what democracy looks like, I take offense to that,” she said, “because we’re in a moment right now that we have to understand that people want more democracy, not less.”

Baker, Murphy, and Onuoha said they do not support the state’s decision to drop the MCAS as a graduation requirement.

The candidates agreed on some other school issues, including expanding early education programs to infants and imposing a bell-to-bell ban on cellphones in schools.

Asked how they would address inequities in education, the candidates offered differing views. Murphy emphasized tackling chronic absenteeism and boosting support for mental health, music and art. Valdez and Frank called for more space for pre-K students. Louijeune, the current council president, highlighted poverty and the need for affordable childcare.

Mejia stressed supporting early childhood education practitioners. Onuoha said he would advocate for helping parents who are struggling with housing. Mathelier and Santana said they would focus on transportation and housing, as 10 percent of students have been homeless during the school year.

Public Safety
Onuoha, Murphy, Baker, and Valdez said they do not want police to stop working with the Boston Regional Intelligence Center (BRIC), a federally funded counterterrorism agency that aims to prevent crime through data-gathering and analysis.

Onuoha, a Mission Hill native, said growing up in a neighborhood directly impacted by street gangs in his youth is part of why he supports BRIC’s work. Louijeune mentioned a deportation that resulted from the center’s intelligence sharing, but Baker said that example is outdated and is not a reason to stop working with it.

Murphy, Onuoha, and Baker said they do not support legalizing overdose prevention centers, where people can safely consume drugs. The candidates all said they would support a policy banning Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from schools and courthouses.
Housing

Baker and Onouha said they do not support Boston’s updated Inclusionary Zoning policy (IDP) that requires 20 percent of new housing units to be income-restricted as a way to increase affordable housing in the city.

Housing construction has slowed in Boston, Baker said, because it has become unsustainable to follow the 20 percent policy. “So 20 percent of nothing is nothing at the end of the day,” he noted.

Onuoha agreed and said focusing on workforce housing – aimed at tenants who earn too much for subsidized housing but not enough for market-rate housing – would be his solution

“You have to be poor to get into affordable housing,” Onuoha said. “You have to be poor to stay in it.”

Baker, Onuoha, and Murphy said they don’t support Mayor Wu’s rent control proposal to cap increases at inflation plus 6 percent.

Baker explained why he opposes it: “Because a lot of renters like myself are small property owners, and I don’t think we necessarily need the government to tell us what we can charge for rent.”

Onuoha said the regulation aimed at stabilizing rent doesn’t work. “We outlawed rent control,” he said, because it increased the cost of housing.

Asked how they would ensure that Boston prioritizes long-term stability for low-income residents, families, and older people, Onouha again mentioned workforce housing, while Baker said he would direct city dollars at housing rather than focusing on policies.

Louijeune emphasized the need for rent stabilization policies as a commitment to Black and low-income communities, preventing them from being displaced by gentrification.

Mathelier advocated for revising Article 80, the process that governs how new development projects are reviewed and approved by the Boston Planning Dept. Santana used the city of Austin, Texas, as a model of what they should aim for. Valdez said the most secure generational housing is achieved by creating tenant protection programs. Mejia and Murphy talked about their work on the City Council and the importance of working with the communities.

Transportation and Infrastructure
Baker was the only candidate to oppose extending past 2026 free bus fares for all riders on routes 23, 28 and 29 through parts of Mattapan, Roxbury, and Dorchester.

“To say that fares are free, we’re paying for it one way or another,” Baker said.

He was also the only candidate to oppose updating zoning rules to require new buildings to achieve net-zero carbon emission standards.
Mejia, Murphy, Baker, Onuoha, and Louijeune all said they oppose the renovation of White Stadium.

All the candidates then offered their visions for a transportation system that balances safety, sustainability, and the needs of drivers, bicyclists, transit riders, and pedestrians. 

“Transportation and housing issues are actually married,” Onouha said.

Baker said the city should do more with water taxis. “And we should also look to see what Uber and Lyft are doing,” he added.

Civic Engagement
Murphy, Onuoha, and Baker said they oppose increasing the $2 million allocated for participatory budgeting, which now allows residents to decide how part of the city budget is spent.

The candidates were asked to grade the city’s success in engaging the voices of diverse residents.

Mathelier, Murphy, Onuoha, Santana, Valdez ,and Baker all gave Boston a C. Louijeune gave the city a B-, and Mejia gave it an incomplete.
They were asked to share what steps they would take to engage the voices of small businesses. There was overall agreement on the need to listen closely and find creative ways to include residents in conversations.

This story is part of a partnership between the Dorchester Reporter and the Boston University Department of Journalism.